Keep the Parking Ordinance Strong!
|
Submitted by BillC on Fri, 01/21/2005 - 22:04.
About 15 enthusiastic cyclists including County Commissioner Jennifer Roberts attended the Jan. 18 City Council hearing on the proposed Bicycle Parking Ordinance. The proposed Ordinance seemed well-received by most Council members, but it must clear two more hurdles and we face powerful and astute opposition that wants to eliminate all long-term bicycle parking from the ordinance (read it here). This would diminish the ordinance's value to commuters, reducing opportunities for cyclists to "rack and ride" on CATS busses, and inciting long-term parkers to fill up the short-term parking that remains. Keep the Ordinance from being watered down before it's adopted! Make sure members of both the following bodies hear from you before the two remaining meetings that will determine the Parking Ordinance's fate:
Both bodies meet at the Charlotte Mecklenburg Government Center, 600 E. Fourth Street. Parking is free in the Government Center garage just across Davidson Street when you exit after 7 PM. The rest of this article contains details that may help you influence the decision-makers. REBIC (the Real Estate and Building Industry Coalition, a regional coalition of real estate and developer associations) seeks not to defeat the proposed Ordinance, but asks the Zoning Commission and City Council to address their "implementation concerns." Sounds reasonable, but here's what they've really asked for:
and two other less sweeping cuts to the proposed bicycle parking quotas. REBIC's changes destroy two essential features of the staff's proposed Ordinance. The Ordinance recognizes that different facilities are required for two very different types of bicycle transportation, short errands and commuting to work. And the Ordinance's widely-available long-term parking facilities are the third leg of the bicycle commuting tripod: bike lanes, bikes on transit, and bike parking. Without the third element, the other two are much less effective. REBIC claims to support bicycle parking, but their changes retreat from making cycling a vital element of our transportation plan and leave just a nice but limited amenity. Not surprisingly, these changes would reduce the proposed Ordinance's very modest cost to developers and property managers which they incur only in new projects or major renovations to near zero. Resist REBIC's effort to water down the Bicycle Parking Ordinance! I received the following advice from someone familiar with the situation:
Make your voice heard today! (See contacts at the top of this article.) You can use this article's "add new comment" link to share your arguments and discuss strategy with your fellow cyclists. |
